BMW M3 Forum
BMW M3 Forum BMW M3 Gallery BMW M3 Reviews BMW M3 Social Groups BMW M3 Chat M3Forum Sponsors >>
Loading


Mobile M3forum
Go Back   BMW M3 Forum.com (E30 M3 | E36 M3 | E46 M3 | E92 M3 | F80/X) > BMW M3 Discussions > E46 M3 (2001-2006)
Tire Rack Buy Winter Tires Now!
Not a member? Register Now!
Register Gallery All Albums Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Calendar FAQ

E46 M3 (2001-2006) Engine: S54 - Max Hp: 333 hp at 7,900 rpm / 262 lb/ft at 4,900 rpm
Total Produced: 45,000+ - Years Produced: 2001 to 2006.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Fri, Mar-14-2014, 09:24:16 PM   #311
Mishimoto
M3Forum Sponsor
 
Mishimoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 293
Reputation: 0 Mishimoto is on a distinguished road

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

Alright guys, radiator data is ready for your viewing pleasure! Thank you for your patience. Check out the detailed report below from our testing and feel free to follow up with any specific questions!


BMW E46 M3 Radiator Testing


Test Vehicle Modifications: Supercharged, intercooler, methanol injection, full exhaust. Professionally tuned @550 whp on pump gas.

Cooling System Upgrades: 13-row oil cooler for supercharger located behind the kidney grills. Frontmount intercooler (FMIC) located in the front air dam. Upgraded clutch fan that spins faster than stock clutch fan.

Additional notes: 100% pure distilled water was used for all tests. Stock radiator was in good condition with no debris clogging the core.


Figure 1: Test vehicle: Notice the additional heat exchangers in front of radiator.

Testing Conditions: Temperature range 82˚F–85˚F and 70% humidity

Testing Location: Orlando Speedworld, 3/8 mile oval track, in Orlando, Florida


Figure 2: Orlando Speedworld track

Apparatus: For temperature monitoring Mishimoto chose the PLX sensor modules driven by the Kiwi WiFi plus iMFD. This is a wireless system from the sensor modules to an iPad or laptop computer. The software used was the Palmer Performance Scan XL pro, which has full data logging capabilities. Sensor locations were installed inline with the upper and lower coolant hoses.


Figure 3: Mounting locations for temperature sensors (Sensor reads approximately 10 times per second).


Figure 4: PLX sensor modules were used to monitor engine pyrometers. (Example)

BACKGROUND AND EXPERIMENT

Mishimoto engineers wanted to test the new Mishimoto radiator in short-track and low-speed track conditions to determine the impact of the increased density of the radiator core. Engineers needed to confirm that the radiator would push enough air through the core to cool the engine and not cause overheating. A dense core design rejects more heat in a higher-speed environment, so testing the radiator in a worst-case scenario was paramount to confirm effectiveness.

Core Information: Compared to the stock core, the Mishimoto core has several changes to improve the conductance of the radiator. Improvements include decreasing fin height, which allows for more coolant tubes, increasing fin pitch, which will aid heat transfer, and increasing overall core thickness. The two figures below represent these changes. Overall capacity in terms of volume for the stock radiator is 0.65 gallon, while the Mishimoto radiator showed a 25% increase to 0.87 gallons.


Figure 5: Coolant surface area (tubes) increased by 32%.


Figure 6: Air surface area (fins) increased by 15%

Track Scenario One

First we drove a few laps around the track to get the engine and tires warmed up. Next, we drove fullspeed laps for about 7–10 minutes, or until the temperature data reached a stable condition. Since the track is an oval we can explain the details of a lap fairly easily. For a typical lap under scenario one, Mishimoto engineers chose to run the car in 3rd gear for the entire lap. The straight section would see an acceleration from 3,000 rpm to 5,000 rpm, or about 40–58 mph, then hard on the brakes down to about 35 mph. As we passed the apex, the car was given partial throttle up to about 40 mph out of the bend; then we accelerated again up to about 58 mph, braked, and repeated. The graph below shows the results of testing under this condition for about five minutes of driving. The temperature data from both radiators show that the car can handle this type of driving without any issues. Oil temperatures under these conditions were approximately 233˚F as observed from the stock gauge.


Figure 7: Overall coolant temperatures are lower with the Mishimoto unit. Pure distilled water was used for all tests. If a 50/50 mixture is used you can expect to add around 10˚F to all plots.

Heat rejection is approximately equal for the stock and Mishimoto radiators under testing conditions for the first scenario. This is expected due to the governing laws of thermodynamics, i.e., energy output of the engine into the cooling system equals heat rejected from the radiator when under steady state. Figure 9 shows a difference of approximately 200 Btu/min, or 6% between the stock and Mishimoto radiators. The difference in total error is due to a combination of lack of testing repeatability and lack of sensor accuracy.


Figure 9: Measured heat rejection

Scenario One Results

Both the stock and Mishimoto radiators were able to stabilize temperatures under the conditions stated for this scenario. One important difference to note is the reduction in the engine output temperature. For the stock radiator the engine output temperature was 195˚F; for the Mishimoto radiator the engine output temperature was 185˚F. Using this information we can calculate the air-to-boil (ATB) temperature. The ATB temperature is the maximum ambient air temperature reached before the engine outlet temperature of coolant will boil, which would result in overheating and engine failure (see Figure 10). For scenario one, the outside ambient temperature would have to be 140˚F for the stock radiator to overheat, while the Mishimoto radiator could allow an ambient temperature of 150˚F before overheating.



Track Scenario Two

First we drove a few laps around the track to get the engine and tires warmed up. Next, we drove the car at full speed using only 3rd gear for 7–10 minutes, just as we did for scenario one. Since the track is an oval we can explain the details of a lap fairly easily. For a typical lap under scenario two, Mishimoto engineers chose to run the car in 2nd gear for the entire lap. The straight section would see an acceleration from 4,200 rpm to 7,800 rpm, or about 40–62 mph, and then hard on the brakes down to about 35 mph. As we passed the apex the car was given partial throttle up to about 40 mph out of the bend; we then accelerated again up to about 62 mph, braked, and repeated. The graph below shows the results of this condition for about five minutes of driving. This driving condition was extreme for the car, so we ended the test after about four minutes of driving. Oil temperatures for the supercharger were extremely hot, and oil began to seep and bubble from the oil pump. Engine oil temperatures were approximately in the 255˚F–260˚F range.


Figure 11: Mishimoto radiator revealed overall lower outlet temperatures when compared to the stock.


Figure 12: Inlet and outlet temperature comparisons. The change in temperature averaged about 3˚F for both radiators.

Inlet temperatures for both the stock and Mishimoto radiators were 2˚F–4˚F hotter than the respective outlet temperatures. Although the temperature difference between the inlet and outlet was slightly less than in the first test, flow rates of the water pump increased with engine speed, and the heat rejection for both radiators resulted in about the same rate as seen in Figure 9.

Scenario Two Results

Heat rejection for both the stock and Mishimoto radiators seemed lower than what the engineers expected. After some calculations the engineers found that the ideal heat rejection from the stock and Mishimoto radiators for both scenarios would be around 6200 Btu/min and 7400 Btu/min, respectively. This Q ideal or theoretical number would indicate perfect conditions, for example: airflow through the radiator core would equal the vehicle speed, and flow of both the coolant and the incoming air would be distributed equally throughout the core. Engineers concluded that the losses from the FMIC, AC condenser, SC oil cooler, pusher fan, and other shrouding lowered the incoming airflow to the radiator by a significant amount. According to the test data, average measured track speed for one lap was 42 mph. Engineers found that airflow was 19 mph instead of the ideal 42 mph. Other loses came from the presence of the FMIC and oil cooler, which increased the incoming air temperatures that enter the radiator, resulting in a lower rate of heat rejection for the radiator.

One additional note worth mentioning is the recovery time of the radiator after the hot lap. Immediately after the test we began cool-down laps by cruising around the track at about 40 mph to cool down the engine. For the stock radiator we needed about two to three minutes before the temperatures would return to about 190˚F, while the Mishimoto radiator needed only about one and a half minutes. In hindsight engineers should have recorded rather than merely observed this information. If we test the radiator again, we will be sure to gather this additional information.

Overall Conclusions

Mishimoto engineers calculated that the test vehicle heat output was 3,700 Btu/min for scenario one and 5,500 Btu/min for scenario two. In scenario one the 550 hp car was able to maintain temperatures with the coolant, engine oil, and supercharger oil. In scenario two the vehicle was not able to maintain a stable condition. The engine output (5,500 Btu/min) was higher than the radiator heat rejection (3,600 Btu/min). This means that it would be only a matter of time before the car would overheat. For scenario two, the supercharger oil and soon-to-be engine oil overheated before the radiator did. Scenario two was an extreme environment when factoring in all the conditions: extra 250 hp vehicle, FMIC, supercharger oil cooler, and very low-speed track. (Note: This is why oval track racecars use such large radiators.) Mishimoto engineers calculated that the Mishimoto and stock radiators would have needed wind speeds of 32 and 36 mph, respectively, to reach the front of the radiator so that scenario two conditions could be maintained.

The Mishimoto radiator is designed for higher speeds but still outperformed the stock radiator in all tests, proving that the newly designed Mishimoto radiator will be an improvement over the stock radiator under all conditions. (Note: Performance will vary depending on vehicle modifications, environment, racing environment, and coolant type.)

Special thanks to Precision-Sport Industries located in Winter Park, Florida for donor vehicle and shop space.

Kevin McCardle
Product Engineer

Thanks for reading! We will be putting together a gallery of images and videos from our day at the track soon!
__________________
Mishimoto Automotive

Last edited by Mishimoto; Fri, Mar-14-2014 at 09:35:51 PM.
Jump to top Mishimoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Register now and remove these ads
Old Fri, Mar-14-2014, 11:47:41 PM   #312
lowbudget
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 146
Reputation: 0 lowbudget is on a distinguished road

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

setup looks promising
Jump to top lowbudget is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sat, Mar-15-2014, 12:39:15 AM   #313
Winegums
Registered User
 
Winegums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Age: 27
Posts: 2,160
In the garage:
Reputation: 0 Winegums is on a distinguished road
Location: Abbotsford, BC

Canada




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

Should help out some guys that get stuck in traffic and over heat, besides the obvious performance uses.
__________________
"What's an M3, like a 328i or something?"
Jump to top Winegums is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sat, Mar-15-2014, 01:33:07 AM   #314
folgrz
Stop lookin at me SWAN!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 572
Reputation: 0 folgrz is on a distinguished road
Location: Long Island

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

This looks so awesome
__________________

E46 M3 Owners Worldwide <---- Join the FB group!!
Jump to top folgrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sat, Mar-15-2014, 02:05:27 AM   #315
Hacksaw
What broke now?
 
Hacksaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,525
In the garage:
Reputation: 0 Hacksaw is on a distinguished road
Location: San Antonio

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

Thanks for the details on the data.

Now we just need to see how this performs in some Texas heat... which is coming shortly!
__________________
'02 BMW ///M3
Imola Red|Blk Cloth|6MT|FS CSL Custom TUNE -MSS54HP|CSL Replica Airbox|Euro Headers|BimmerWorld 3.5" race front Y and resonator|Hacksaw's custom 3.5" SS exhaust system w/Magnaflow and 4 tipped goodness|SGT RS-ENR Coilover Kit|Evo Sport Performance Pulley Set|CDV Delete|UUC USS & DSSR|Sparco Roadster Seats|StopTech ST-40 BBKs on all 4|Beisan Systems vanos rebuild w/original stock exhaust hub|Kirk 4 point roll bar|CF CSL Rep Trunk|GC Race F/R Sway Bars|TR Motorsports MT-1|Avin Avant 2|Seibon CF GTR Hood

Jump to top Hacksaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sat, Mar-15-2014, 09:25:59 AM   #316
Tippin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 85
Reputation: 0 Tippin is on a distinguished road

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

So when can we buy one huh huh huh?
Jump to top Tippin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sat, Mar-15-2014, 03:30:00 PM   #317
SunD3v1L
hi
 
SunD3v1L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 12,282
In the garage:
Reputation: 0 SunD3v1L is on a distinguished road
Location: the strand

Italy




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

Is there a link/thread for the data on the old model?


Sent from my eyefone.
__________________
Jump to top SunD3v1L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sat, Mar-15-2014, 07:29:29 PM   #318
jww///95
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 205
Reputation: 0 jww///95 is on a distinguished road

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tippin View Post
So when can we buy one huh huh huh?
+1 !!!!
Jump to top jww///95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sat, Mar-15-2014, 08:59:34 PM   #319
NOBIGDL
ForceFed Motorsports
 
NOBIGDL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Reputation: 0 NOBIGDL is on a distinguished road
Location: Bellingham, WA

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tippin View Post
So when can we buy one huh huh huh?
__________________
Current: ISF | E46M | C300 AMG Sport+
Past: S40 T5 | NA1 NSX | Acura TL | LS-T DC4
Jump to top NOBIGDL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mon, Mar-17-2014, 07:48:36 PM   #320
Mishimoto
M3Forum Sponsor
 
Mishimoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 293
Reputation: 0 Mishimoto is on a distinguished road

United States




Default Re: Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowbudget View Post
setup looks promising
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winegums View Post
Should help out some guys that get stuck in traffic and over heat, besides the obvious performance uses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by folgrz View Post
This looks so awesome
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hacksaw View Post
Thanks for the details on the data.

Now we just need to see how this performs in some Texas heat... which is coming shortly!
Thanks! We are very pleased with the performance of this unit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tippin View Post
So when can we buy one huh huh huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jww///95 View Post
+1 !!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBIGDL View Post
Thanks! Although we have yet to completely solidify a date of release, we are expecting to have both the radiator and fan-mount setup available by late May or early June. Our team is hard at work to hasten the process as much as possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SunD3v1L View Post
Is there a link/thread for the data on the old model?
Sent from my eyefone.
At this time we do not have data for our previous offering.

Thanks
__________________
Mishimoto Automotive
Jump to top Mishimoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
M3Forum.com and M3forum.net is in no way sponsored, endorsed or affiliated by or with BMW NA / BMW AG or any of it's subsidiaries or vendors.
BMW and M3 (E90 M3 | E92 M3 | E93 M3 | E46 M3 | E36 M3 | E30 M3) are registered trademarks of BMW AG.
M3Forum Terms of Service
Copyright 1999-2017 M3Forum.com
Discussing Mishimoto E46 M3 Build Thread in the E46 M3 (2001-2006) Forum - Engine: S54 - Max Hp: 333 hp at 7,900 rpm / 262 lb/ft at 4,900 rpm
Total Produced: 45,000+ - Years Produced: 2001 to 2006. at BMW M3 Forum.com (E30 M3 | E36 M3 | E46 M3 | E92 M3 | F80/X)