View Single Post
Old Fri, Oct-13-2017, 07:28:28 AM   #47
Bimmerman325i
Beardface McMountainMan
 
Bimmerman325i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,367
Reputation: 0 Bimmerman325i is on a distinguished road
Location: Menlo Park

United States




Default Re: 13.5F/13R & 19's - most comfortable suspension avail?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aznbo187 View Post
Care to elaborate on mono vs twin? Conceptually, I still don't understand a clear advantage for either configuration and when one is preferred over the other. Current setup is the Eibach PSS which is a mono - however, tbh, I remember my friends TCK being more comfortable at a higher spring rate and lower height.
Theoretically there is a difference in response and consistency of performance, in addition to ride comfort and load handling and the size of the rainbow a unicorn farts under a blue moon while Saturn is in retrograde.

Realistically, in my experience twin tubes seem comfier and monotubes tend to be harsher. The real magic comes in the damper piston and design of the damping mechanism (eg MCS bump dissipation) and that far outweighs, IMO, the academic twin tube vs monotube debate. I don't think the distinction matters what so ever for a street suspension.

As far as a blanket statement can be made however, twin tubes a la Koni are well mannered trackable sporty street shocks. Monotubes such as MCS and Bilstein are stiff streetable race car shocks. Then you have JRZ RS coming in as a twin tube spoiler to the race car shock brigade, so while the trend exists it is hardly a definitive statement.
__________________
1995 BMW M3/2/5-- S54/Mk60 California Smog Legal (Build Thread)
1998 BMW M3/4/5 -- DD rev1
2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT, Orange Blast Metallic -- DD rev2

Last edited by Bimmerman325i; Fri, Oct-13-2017 at 07:33:49 AM.
Jump to top Bimmerman325i is offline   Reply With Quote